Florida recently passed a law requiring older drivers (+80) to have their eyes examined. (Please refrain from guffawing). The result as described here, was a statistically significant decrease in fatalities among these drivers. At least three factors were involved. Some drivers flunked the test and stopped driving; others got new prescriptions to pass the test, which made them better drivers; others just let their licenses expire because they knew they would fail.
In my mind this is a public policy success. Fatalities declined and a bunch of folks can see better. This begs the question: should this policy be directed at drivers of all ages, instead of just older drivers? My uninformed guess is that there would be some benefit, but not as much as for older drivers.
So how many lives would make it worth it? If it would save 5 lives, would YOU require everyone to have their eyes examined? 100 lives? 1000 lives?
No comments:
Post a Comment